David Isaak's blog about his debut novel SHOCK AND AWE--plus thoughts on writing, reading, publishing, joining the Macmillan New Writing family, and whatever else comes to mind
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
A Quick Note on Rejection...
An ever-popular topic. If you haven't seen it before (and even if you have, come to think of it), here is a letter from an editor rejecting Ursula K. LeGuin's bestselling Left Hand of Darkness, which went on to win both the Hugo and Nebula Awards.
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Wow. This is a good argument for always responding with a form letter.
For Left Hand of Darkness? Incredible. That book is a piece of genius.
It only goes to show that there are a lot of different tastes out there.
I personally dislike a lot of highly acclaimed things, even when I recognize the talent behind them. Sometimes because I don't recognize the talent behind them (yes, I'm looking at you, Dan Brown).
I could understand--just--if the book had been turned down as being too unusual/radical: for its time, TLOD was both. But to reject it because the narrative pacing didn't work was simply ludicrous.
It's an argument too for keeping all your rejection letters so that when you are famous you can display them with a disdainful flourish.
I know they try to make you think you need to register to leave comments. Nope. Just Post as 'Anonymous' and say who you are in the body of your comment. (The little verification code seems to time out in about ten seconds, so you'll probably have it spin round and demand you type something else. Don't give up.)
3 comments:
Wow. This is a good argument for always responding with a form letter.
For Left Hand of Darkness? Incredible. That book is a piece of genius.
It only goes to show that there are a lot of different tastes out there.
I personally dislike a lot of highly acclaimed things, even when I recognize the talent behind them. Sometimes because I don't recognize the talent behind them (yes, I'm looking at you, Dan Brown).
I could understand--just--if the book had been turned down as being too unusual/radical: for its time, TLOD was both. But to reject it because the narrative pacing didn't work was simply ludicrous.
It's an argument too for keeping all your rejection letters so that when you are famous you can display them with a disdainful flourish.
Post a Comment